Ignorance Is Happiness

Ignorance is happiness Think ab let out communication now, how do muckle talk to each other? Think about entertainment, how do batch have childs play? Or how about knowledge, how do people sh atomic number 18 information? How do people find out about history? People today use cell phones, the Internet, and the television. But until about a century ago, no one had any of that. No one had Phones or flat screen TVs. No one had Facebook or Twitter accounts. So how did people back then live and work? The react is with writing, with books. People still choose today, but what if people lost all(prenominal) interest in books?What if people looseed on books? Would mass book burnings start? Would books be outlawed and become illegal? What would fiat be the likes of then? This is exactly what tool Bradburys novel is about. In this book, the author describes a society where books have been banned by the government, and because of that, ignorant is all that the people there are. In act inotherapy Bradburys novel, Fahrenheit 451, he utilizes the setting, conflict, and point of view to enhance this theme. In belles-lettres, the setting is the period and prescribe a story takes place.Ray Bradbury used the futuristic setting to show what a world where television and sea shell radios are the most important things in a persons life would be like. Hes created a society somemagazine after 1990, in a place called elmwood City. It is a place where every one is equally ignorant, where the government tries to brainwash everyone to not question anything. Beatty quoted, The central office environment can undo a lot you try to do at school. Thats why weve lowered the kindergarten age year after year until now were almost snatching them from the cradle (Bradbury 60).In roll to give away sure people grow up the way they want, the government has made sure children are taught from a very young age what they should believe in. Kids like Clarisse McClellan are thought of as ou tcasts because she questions everything approximately her. The citizens then do not like to call up independently either. Faber said, Off-hours, yes. But time to think rushes you on so quickly to its own conclusions your mind hasnt time to protest, what nonsense (Bradbury 84). The quotes, patience, Montag. Let the war turn off the families. Our civilization is flinging itself to pieces. Stand back from the centrifuge (Bradbury 87), and, In again out again Finnegan (Bradbury 94), shows that people who they should do about are not important. Husbands are off at war, and their wives do not care at all. The setting contributes a lot to the theme, without the futuristic setting, the impact would not have been as great. line drawing also plays a part in the story. Characterization is when the writer reveals the personality of or describes a character.This helps by letting the representers gain more understanding of the people of that time. Mrs. Phelps stated, He (her husband) said , if I get killed off, you just go right ahead and dont cry, but get married again, and dont think of me (Bradbury 95). This quote shows that relationships are not significant anymore people do not take the time to keep healthy relationships and communicate. Mildred quoted, Its only two thousand dollars. And I think you should consider me sometimes. (Bradbury 20).Even though Guy Montag said that in order to have the fourth wall put in, hed have to pay a third of his yearly pay, Mildred does not seem to care. All she wants is her entertainment. Not all people then are like Mildred and Mrs. Phelps though, there are people like Clarisse McClellan. She said, I rarely watch the parlor walls or go to races or Fun Parks. So Ive lots of time for crazy thoughts, I guess (Bradbury 9). Clarisse does not spend her time driving around at certifiable speeds running over pedestrians. She likes to take walks, enjoy nature.She likes to taste the rain and smell the flowers. But because of this she was thought of as weird and crazy. There is definitely something wrong with a society like that if someone like Clarisse became an outcast. The locomote thing that Ray Bradbury in cooperated into his novel was the conflicts. Conflicts are struggles between two forces. There were both extraneous and internal conflicts in the story. One conflict is and internal conflict when Montag burned the woman, and starts to see that everything he had been doing his upstanding life was wrong, and starts wondering what books have to say. There must be something in books, things we cant imagine, to make a woman stay in a burning house there must be something there. You dont stay for nothing (Bradbury 51). Another conflict is between him and Mildred. Books are not people. You read and I look all around, but there isnt anybody (Bradbury 73). This shows how ignorant and shallow people like Mildred can be. She spends all day watching the television, completely immersed with her parlor families. The last conflict is between Montag and Beatty, or the society he lives in. Beatty said, serenity, Montag.Peace, Montag. Take your fight outside. Better yet, into the incineratorburn all burn everything. Fire is bright and fire is clean (Bradbury 59-60). Beatty said that he too, was once curious about books, so he read them, laws or no laws. But he did not want to think about the meanings behind the manner of speaking in books, and he turned against them. Beatty does not burn books because he is told to, but he actually believes in burning books. He believes that books cause confusion, contradictions, and disorder. But the one thing that he does not realize is that, that is what literature is for.There are many important messages that Fahrenheit 451 portrays. In order to help us understand them, Ray Bradburys novel, Fahrenheit 451 uses the setting, characterization, and conflict to help underline these themes. The setting that was created was a futuristic society. This helped the re aders imagine what a world without books or knowledge would be like. The characterization of the people showed that everyone was happy without knowledge, and the people who were not were outcasts. at long last the conflicts between the characters demonstrate the ignorance of the people.